Big Brain LabJoin the team
Products

Crawl, walk, run.

Understanding the brain is an ambitious vision so we will sequence our work in order to offer products that create value along the way.

The best analogy for our approach is SpaceX.

CrawlWalkRun
SpaceXCargoStarlinkMars
Big Brain LabAlzheimer's readoutBrain region mapsWhole brain emulation
  1. 1
    Crawl Cargo

    An Alzheimer's drug readout at synapse resolution

    Tell a drug program whether its compound saved synapses in the mouse, before it spends hundreds of millions of dollars on a Phase 3.

    The problem
    Alzheimer's is a disease of lost synapses: synapse density tracks cognitive decline far more closely than plaques or tangles do. Yet drug programs are judged on plaque load, bulk stains and behavior in mice, a record the NIH's MODEL-AD consortium sums up as hundreds of interventions that improved cognition in mice and models that have not predicted a therapy's effect in trials. In people the decisive test is still a Phase 3 of about 1,800 patients over 18 months, in a program modeled at $462 million per agent through Phase 3.
    Our solution
    We count every synapse the detectors find in a block of tissue, in 3D, and place each one relative to the pathology. In the public 3xTg mouse volume, synapse density within 10 micrometers of a plaque is 43 to 62 percent below plaque-free tissue in the same layer, depending on which of the preprint's two synapse detectors is used, while the loss averaged over the whole block is 6 percent, which is all a bulk stain sees. The product is a blinded study in the sponsor's own model, with these targets: eight animals per arm, treated, untreated and non-transgenic, one block of hippocampus each, the analysis fixed in advance, delivered in about six months and priced per animal, reporting synapse density by layer and by distance from plaques, tau and microglia before the decision to go to the clinic.
    Why it is better than what exists
    Today the question a program can answer before the clinic is whether a compound cleared plaques and moved a behavior score; in people, synapses are read only by SV2A PET, an indirect marker, and the program's fate is decided by cognition scores at the end of Phase 3, about 7.6 years and $462 million per agent after Phase 1 begins. Our study answers it in the mouse before Phase 1, with a placed count whose local deficit was seven to ten times the block average in our reanalysis of one plaque in one animal, in the same animals the program already runs. What that is worth is the clinical years and dollars not spent on compounds that fail the synapse test, up to 7.6 years and $462 million per agent, and the first paid study, which also runs array tomography on the adjacent block as the head-to-head, is the test of whether the readout earns it.
    The market if it works
    The buyer is a program deciding whether a compound goes forward: 158 drugs are in 192 Alzheimer's trials this year, with more behind them in preclinical work. Pharma has paid for human brain data inside target-discovery alliances, Merck $25 million upfront to Cerevance and GSK €33.5 million to Muna, and behind the programs is a disease of 7.4 million Americans, $409 billion a year in dementia care and Leqembi at about $555 million in sales in its third year. The pool grows as people outlive heart disease: a third of Americans 85 and older have Alzheimer's dementia, dementia is already the leading cause of death in the United Kingdom and Australia, and Japan, with a third of America's age-standardized heart-disease death rate, expects 5.84 million people with dementia by 2040.

    Terry et al., Ann Neurol 1991 · Sukoff Rizzo et al., MODEL-AD, 2020 · Territo, MODEL-AD, Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024 (AAIC abstract) · Mecca et al., SV2A PET, 2020 · Cummings et al., costs, 2022 · Scott et al., Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014 · van Dyck et al., Clarity AD, NEJM 2023 · Cummings et al., pipeline 2026 · Han et al., bioRxiv 2023 · Koffie et al., PNAS 2009 · Alzheimer's Association, 2026 Facts and Figures · Alzheimer's Association, 2025 Facts and Figures · Eisai FY2025 Leqembi sales (Fierce Pharma) · Alzheimer's Society, UK 2024 deaths · Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2024 · GBD 2021 ischemic heart disease, G20 · Japan Times, dementia estimate 2040

    When a program learns whether its drug saved synapsesyear 02468TodayPhase 1$79MPhase 2$141MPhase 3$462Mreviewcumulative cost per agent by the end of each phase (modeled)the human answer: cognition scores at the end of Phase 37.6 years and $462M per agent after Phase 1 beginsWith thereadoutthe mouse answer: a synapse count, before Phase 1worth it only if the mouse answer predicts the human onePhase lengths: Scott et al. 2014. Costs: Cummings et al. 2022, modeled, 2021 dollars.
    When a program learns whether its drug saved synapses. Today that answer comes from cognition scores at the end of Phase 3, 7.6 years and $462 million per agent after Phase 1 begins (phase lengths from Scott et al. 2014; cumulative costs per agent from Cummings et al. 2022, modeled, 2021 dollars). With the readout it comes from the mouse before Phase 1. The clinical years and dollars are at stake, not yet saved: whether the mouse answer predicts the human one is what the first paid study starts to test.
    Synapses around one plaqueas the map counts them, every synapse placedSame block, averagedas a stain or PET voxel sees it10 µm0 to 5 µm: 0.30measured, uncorrected0 to 10 µm, layer-corrected: 0.38 to 0.5720 to 30 µm: 0.81beyond 50 µm: 1.043 to 62% fewer at the plaque6% fewer over the whole blockschematic: dots at the measured densities, not detected synapsesrings at 10 and 30 µm; our reanalysis, one animal, one plaque; two detectors
    The measurement itself: the same block of mouse hippocampus, two readouts. Left: synapse density around one plaque as the map measures it, in shells from the plaque edge, 0.30 at the edge rising to 1.0 far away (our reanalysis of the public 3xTg volume, not corrected for the layer the plaque sits in; corrected, the loss within 10 micrometers is 43 percent on the preprint's transfer-learning detector and 62 percent on its supervised one, which agree on the raw profile and differ on how much the layer explains). Right: the same block as a stain or a PET voxel reports it, one number, 0.94. One animal, one plaque: the volume's second plaque lies outside the annotated box. Han et al.'s own cubes from the plaque center put the nearest at 15 percent of the farthest; Koffie et al. found 60 percent loss in the halo by array tomography. Methods note with every number.
  2. 2
    Walk Starlink

    A readable map of the human brain, one disease region at a time

    The same measurement in the human regions each brain disease destroys, read with the tools we build, and sold to everyone who needs them.

    The problem
    Neurology drugs are approved at 5.9 percent from Phase 1 against 7.9 percent for drugs overall, and the animal results that put them in the clinic are rarely checked against human synapses, because the human data are thin. The largest dense human volume is a cubic millimeter of cortex from one surgical sample; the Cajal group's Alzheimer's samples are five cases and five controls per study. A human disease region mapped densely enough to read which cells and pathways lose their synapses does not yet exist.
    Our solution
    Map the regions each disease destroys at synapse resolution, from banked tissue with the donor's history attached and from living surgical tissue: hippocampus and entorhinal cortex for Alzheimer's first, then substantia nigra, motor cortex and spinal cord, prefrontal cortex. Banked tissue answers whether people who had plaques and stayed sharp kept their synapses; living cortical slices, which survive two to three weeks in culture, give a compound's acute effect on human synapses against a vehicle slice from the same patient. The software we build to read our own maps, starting with our proofreading model, goes to everyone producing maps.
    Why it is better than what exists
    The human brain data pharma has paid for are gene-expression and cell maps; a synapse-level map of a human disease region has not been sold. The mouse stays in the loop for the dosing experiments a person cannot be given, and the human map is what the mouse result gets checked against.
    The market if it works
    3.4 billion people live with a condition of the nervous system, the leading cause of ill health worldwide by disability-adjusted life years (the count includes headache and stroke). Pharma pays upfront for discovery platforms it can make decisions with: Roche paid Recursion $150 million upfront for up to 40 programs. The incretin drugs, GLP-1s among them, are forecast at $200 billion a year by 2030, the scale of one treatable disease class.

    BIO, clinical development success rates 2011 to 2020 · Shapson-Coe et al., Science 2024 · Montero-Crespo et al., Brain 2021 · Domínguez-Álvaro et al., Acta Neuropathol Commun 2018 · Schwarz et al., Sci Rep 2017 · Schwarz et al., eLife 2019 · GBD 2021 · J.P. Morgan Research, February 2026 · Recursion and Roche, 2021 · MICrONS Consortium, Nature 2025

    H01, the one dense human volume so far:1 cubic millimeter, drawn to scale1Hippocampus, entorhinal cortexAlzheimer's, first2SubstantianigraParkinson's3Motor cortexALS4Prefrontal cortexpsychiatric disease
    The human regions each disease destroys, numbered in the order we propose to map them; the spinal cord, part of the ALS work, is below the drawing. The red square is a volume equal to H01, the one dense human volume so far: one cubic millimeter of temporal cortex, drawn to scale against a brain about 17 centimeters long.
  3. 3
    Run Mars

    A brain that runs

    A model of a mapped brain that predicts what it will do, and what a drug does to it.

    The problem
    We cannot yet predict what a brain will do from its structure. Drugs for the brain are found by trial and error because the models of the system they act on capture only parts of it, and the trial is the experiment.
    Our solution
    A simulation of a mapped brain, starting with the fly, then the MICrONS cubic millimeter, the one volume where activity and wiring come from the same neurons, then a whole mouse brain, which we intend to have mapped by 2033, checked against recorded samples of its activity and its behavior. The methods now reading artificial networks (Why now) apply here, because a simulated brain has activity to read. The first version is a research instrument; the later ones are where brain drugs get designed.
    Why the cost of a map will fall
    Costs collapse when the tool changes: Falcon 9 cut the cost of a kilogram to orbit about 20x below the Shuttle, and a human genome fell about 570,000-fold in nominal dollars, about a million-fold in 2025 dollars, in the twenty-two years from the $300 million draft of 2000 to $525 in 2022, most of it after the sequencer changed in 2008. A cubic millimeter of brain map has fallen about 10x since the first measured tracing rate in 2013, because its cost is people tracing by hand, and wages do not fall. We are changing the instrument, from electrons to light, and the labor, from people to models, and our target is the next 100x: a mouse brain under $100 million, the map a brain that runs is built on (Mapping, above).
    The market if it works
    Where drugs get designed, and, much further out, the mind itself: if a human mind can one day be reproduced outside biology, that is a path to extending human life indefinitely. The odds of success for this long-term vision are low and the journey will be long. But we are pursuing it anyway, because at a minimum it will further our understanding of the brain, and if we are successful it will be a tremendous benefit to humanity.

    Dorkenwald et al., Nature 2024 · MICrONS Consortium, Nature 2025 · Anthropic, 2025 · Herculano-Houzel et al., PNAS 2006 · Azevedo et al., J Comp Neurol 2009

    $100$1k$10k$100k$1M$10M$100M$1.0B1960198020002020Vanguard, 1957: $1M per kg, 2025 dollarsDelta E, 1960: $215k per kg, 2025 dollarsScout, 1961: $143k per kg, 2025 dollarsTitan II, 1962: $40k per kg, 2025 dollarsAtlas-Centaur, 1964: $36k per kg, 2025 dollarsProton SL-13, 1965: $5k per kg, 2025 dollarsSaturn IB, 1966: $22k per kg, 2025 dollarsSoyuz, 1966: $10k per kg, 2025 dollarsKosmos, 1967: $10k per kg, 2025 dollarsSaturn V, 1967: $7k per kg, 2025 dollarsLong March 2E, 1971: $10k per kg, 2025 dollarsTitan-Centaur, 1974: $14k per kg, 2025 dollarsLong March 2C, 1974: $13k per kg, 2025 dollarsDelta 3910, 1975: $36k per kg, 2025 dollarsSpace Shuttle, 1981: $79k per kg, 2025 dollarsLong March 3B, 1984: $8k per kg, 2025 dollarsZenit 2, 1985: $6k per kg, 2025 dollarsAriane 44, 1988: $23k per kg, 2025 dollarsDelta II, 1989: $20k per kg, 2025 dollarsTitan IV, 1989: $32k per kg, 2025 dollarsTaurus, 1989: $26k per kg, 2025 dollarsPegasus XL, 1990: $56k per kg, 2025 dollarsAtlas IIA, 1991: $25k per kg, 2025 dollarsStart, 1993: $21k per kg, 2025 dollarsH-2, 1994: $34k per kg, 2025 dollarsRockot, 1994: $13k per kg, 2025 dollarsAthena 1, 1995: $41k per kg, 2025 dollarsAthena 2, 1995: $21k per kg, 2025 dollarsAriane 5G, 1996: $17k per kg, 2025 dollarsDelta III, 1998: $15k per kg, 2025 dollarsDnepr, 1999: $6k per kg, 2025 dollarsZenit 3SL, 1999: $10k per kg, 2025 dollarsFalcon 9, 2010: $3k per kg, 2025 dollarsVega, 2012: $13k per kg, 2025 dollarsFalcon Heavy, 2018: $2k per kg, 2025 dollarsDraft human genome, worldwide (Human Genome Project), 2000: $561M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2001: $173M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2002: $110M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2003: $70M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2004: $32M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2005: $23M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2006: $17M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2007: $11M, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2008: $512k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2009: $106k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2010: $43k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2011: $11k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2012: $8k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2013: $7k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2014: $5k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2015: $2k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2016: $2k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2017: $1k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2018: $2k, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2019: $763, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2020: $637, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2021: $539, 2025 dollarsNHGRI cost per genome, 2022: $578, 2025 dollarsC. elegans, by hand, 1986: $211M to $634M per mm³, 2025 dollars. 302 neurons traced by hand on printed micrographs over about 15 years by four authors; 20 to 60 person-years assumed, over the worm's 0.002 mm³ body.Mouse retina, crowd tracing, 2013: $143M per mm³, 2025 dollars. 0.0135 work-hours per µm³, 6,750 person-years per mm³.Mouse cortex, Motta et al., 2019: $85M per mm³, 2025 dollars. 500,000 µm³ in 4,000 work-hours, 4,000 person-years per mm³.Fly hemibrain, 2020: $79M per mm³, 2025 dollars. 50 person-years on 1.33 × 10⁷ µm³, 3,760 person-years per mm³.Fly whole-brain rate, 2023: $13M per mm³, 2025 dollars. 800 µm³ per proofreader-hour, 625 person-years per mm³.Wellcome projection, 2023: $16M to $46M per mm³, 2025 dollars. $7.5 to 21.7 billion for a 500 mm³ mouse brain, all-in.MICrONS, 2025: $128M per mm³, 2025 dollars. $100 million program, 2016 to 2021, one cubic millimeter plus its functional imaging.BRAIN CONNECTS budget, 2028: $3M per mm³, 2025 dollars. $33 million for 10 mm³ by 2028; the Harvard grant was terminated in May 2025 and restored that August.Our target, 2033: $200k per mm³, 2025 dollars. a whole mouse brain under $100 million.Vanguard, $1MShuttle, $79kFalcon 9, $3kDraft genome, $561M2022, $578C. elegansMICrONSFly hemibrainFly rate, 2023Wellcome estimateNIH budget, 2028Our target, $200k
    A kilogram to low Earth orbitA human genomeA cubic millimeter of brain mapFilled: spent or measured. Hollow: projection or goal. Bar: published range.
    Two precedents, weighted equally: launch and the genome each fell when the instrument changed; the brain map has not. All three series in 2025 dollars (CPI-U). Launch: Jones, NASA, 2018, Table A1, each system at its first launch; the line follows Vanguard, Saturn V, Shuttle, Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy. Genome: NHGRI's cost per genome at its funded centers, plus NHGRI's $300 million for the draft human genome. Brain: one project or estimate per point divided by its volume, with labor priced at the $20,000 per person-year in Wellcome's Figure 5; the 1986 point assumes 20 to 60 person-years for White et al. The hollow marks are projections, budgets and our goal. The three series have different units and are not economically comparable; what the chart compares is their shape when the instrument changed. Sources: Jones, NASA, 2018, NHGRI, NHGRI, the first genome, Wellcome, 2023, BLS CPI-U.
Products | Big Brain Lab